Readers,
This has been my summer of blouse-sewing. I cranked out several sleeveless renditions of Vogue Patterns 8772 in June, which I’ve been wearing and enjoying a lot.
Next, I tried a version with sleeves.


I was wondering whether I’d need to add a little width to the back pattern piece to allow for a more freedom of movement in the sleeve versions.

This blouse is perfectly wearable, but next time I’ll try adding 1/4th inch width in the back pattern piece across the shoulder area, giving a total of an extra 1/2 inch in the garment, and compare.
I also put my new blouse to the O-H-I-O test, which is extremely important in the land of the Ohio State University Buckeyes:




It passed.
(Photos by Cynthia DeGrand)



Very nice blouse and the fit is wonderful!
Thank you, Faye!
The fit is spot on! I can see the long sleeve version on the horizon! Funny, I used to sew/wear so many more blouses and shirts when I was teaching. Now it seems I’m more the polo shirt/ knit top kind of person. Your recent makes may just guide me back to blouses. They are always a more polished look, especially under a jacket.
I see what you mean about needing a bit more room in the back shoulder area. I’ve come across this myself. I’ve begun to think that when we use a smaller pattern to get the front chest and shoulder area to fit, the back suffers a bit. I’m wondering if the pant technique of using a bigger size for the back would work? Just thinking out loud here….adding 1/4 nice would give the same result. Let us know how it works out with the next blouse!
Maybe I’m just in a phase, but I’m under the spell of blouses now, and they do feel more polished to me (and slightly old-fashioned, as for me they hearken back to a time when t-shirts weren’t so widely worn and everybody knew how to wield an iron). Your pants comparison is a good idea. I hadn’t made the connection.
PS love the Ohio cheer!
Thank you–I admit it’s pretty corny, but sincere!